Wednesday, 17 December 2014

Web Data Extraction Services and Data Collection Form Website Pages

For any business market research and surveys plays crucial role in strategic decision making. Web scrapping and data extraction techniques help you find relevant information and data for your business or personal use. Most of the time professionals manually copy-paste data from web pages or download a whole website resulting in waste of time and efforts.

Instead, consider using web scraping techniques that crawls through thousands of website pages to extract specific information and simultaneously save this information into a database, CSV file, XML file or any other custom format for future reference.

Examples of web data extraction process include:

• Spider a government portal, extracting names of citizens for a survey
• Crawl competitor websites for product pricing and feature data
• Use web scraping to download images from a stock photography site for website design

Automated Data Collection

Web scraping also allows you to monitor website data changes over stipulated period and collect these data on a scheduled basis automatically. Automated data collection helps you discover market trends, determine user behavior and predict how data will change in near future.

Examples of automated data collection include:

• Monitor price information for select stocks on hourly basis
• Collect mortgage rates from various financial firms on daily basis
• Check whether reports on constant basis as and when required

Using web data extraction services you can mine any data related to your business objective, download them into a spreadsheet so that they can be analyzed and compared with ease.

In this way you get accurate and quicker results saving hundreds of man-hours and money!

With web data extraction services you can easily fetch product pricing information, sales leads, mailing database, competitors data, profile data and many more on a consistent basis.

Should you have any queries regarding Web Data extraction services, please feel free to contact us. We would strive to answer each of your queries in detail.

Source:http://ezinearticles.com/?Web-Data-Extraction-Services-and-Data-Collection-Form-Website-Pages&id=4860417

Monday, 15 December 2014

Scraping bids out for SS United States

Yesterday we posted that the Independence Seaport Museum doesn’t have the money to support the upkeep of the USS Olympia nor does it have the money to dredge the channel to tow her away.  On the other side of the river the USS New Jersey Battleship Museum is also having financial troubles. Given the current troubles centered around the Delaware River it almost seems a shame to report that the SS United States, which has been sitting of at Pier 84 in South Philadelphia for the last fourteen years,  is now being inspected by scrap dealers.  Then again, she is a rusting, gutted shell.  Perhaps it is time to let the old lady go.    As reported in Maritime Matters:

SS UNITED STATES For Scrap?

An urgent message was sent out today to the SS United States Conservancy alerting members that the fabled liner, currently laid up at Philadelphia, is being inspected by scrap merchants.

“Dear SS United States Conservancy Members and Supporters:

The SS United States Conservancy has learned that America’s national flagship, the SS United States, may soon be destroyed. The ship’s current owners, Genting Hong Kong (formerly Star Cruises Limited), through its subsidiary, Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL), are currently collecting bids from scrappers.

The ship’s current owners listed the vessel for sale in February, 2009. While NCL graciously offered the Conservancy first right of refusal on the vessel’s sale, the Conservancy has not been in a financial position to purchase the ship outright. However, the Conservancy has been working diligently to lay the groundwork for a public-private partnership to save and sustain the ship for generations to come.

Source:http://www.oldsaltblog.com/2010/03/scraping-bids-out-for-ss-united-states/

Autoscraping casts a wider net

We have recently started letting more users into the private beta for our Autoscraping service. We’re receiving a lot of applications following the shutdown of Needlebase and we’re increasing our capacity to accommodate these users.

Natalia made a screencast to help our new users get started:

It’s also a great introduction to what this service can do.

We released slybot as an open source integration of the scrapely extraction library and the scrapy framework. This is the core technology behind the autoscraping service and we will make it easy to export autoscraping spiders from Scrapinghub  and run them completely with slybot – allowing our users to have the flexibility and freedom provided by open source.

Source:http://blog.scrapinghub.com/2012/02/27/autoscraping-casts-a-wider-net/

Saturday, 13 December 2014

ScraperWiki: A story about two boys, web scraping and a worm

“It’s like a buddy movie.” she said.
Not quite the kind of story lead I’m used to. But what do you expect if you employ journalists in a tech startup?
“Tell them about that computer game of his that you bought with your pocket money.”
She means the one with the risqué name.
I think I’d rather tell you about screen scraping, and why it is fundamental to the nature of data.

About how Julian spent almost a decade scraping himself to death until deciding to step back out and build a tool to make it easier.

I’ll give one example.
Two boys
In 2003, Julian wanted to know how his MP had voted on the Iraq war.
The lists of votes were there, on the www.parliament.uk website. But buried behind dozens of mouse clicks.
Julian and I wrote some software to read the pages for us, and created what eventually became TheyWorkForYou.

We could slice and dice the votes, mix them with some knowledge from political anaroks, and create simple sentences. Mini computer generated stories.

“Louise Ellman voted very strongly for the Iraq war.”
You can see it, and other stories, there now. Try the postcode of the ScraperWiki office, L3 5RF.

I remember the first lobbiest I showed it to. She couldn’t believe it. Decades of work done in an instant by a computer. An encyclopedia of data there in a moment.

Web Scraping

It might seem like a trick at first, as if it was special to Parliament. But actually, everyone does this kind of thing.

Google search is just a giant screen scraper, with one secret sauce algorithm guessing its ranking data.
Facebook uses scraping as a core part of its viral growth to let users easily import their email address book.

There’s lots of messy data in the world. Talk to a geek or a tech company, and you’ll find a screen scraper somewhere.

Why is this?
It’s Tautology

On the surface, screen scrapers look just like devices to work round incomplete IT systems.

Parliament used to publish quite rough HTML, and certainly had no database of MP voting records. So yes, scrapers are partly a clever trick to get round that.

But even if Parliament had published it in a structured format, their publishing would never have been quite right for what we wanted to do.

We still would have had to write a data loader (search for ‘ETL’ to see what a big industry that is). We still would have had to refine the data, linking to other datasets we used about MPs. We still would have had to validate it, like when we found the dead MP who voted.

It would have needed quite a bit of programming, that would have looked very much like a screen scraper.

And then, of course, we still would have had to build the application, connecting the data to the code that delivered the tool that millions of wonks and citizens use every year.

Core to it all is this: When you’re reusing data for a new purpose, a purpose the original creator didn’t intend, you have to work at it.

Put like that, it’s a tautology.
A journalist doesn’t just want to know what the person who created the data wanted them to know.
Scrape Through
So when Julian asked me to be CEO of ScraperWiki, that’s what went through my head.
Secrets buried everywhere.

The same kind of benefits we found for politics in TheyWorkForYou, but scattered across a hundred countries of public data, buried in a thousand corporate intranets.

If only there was a tool for that.
A Worm
And what about my pocket money?
Nicola was talking about Fat Worm Blows a Sparky.
Julian’s boss’s wife gave it its risqué name while blowing bubbles in the bath. It was 1986. Computers were new. He was 17.

Fat Worm cost me £9.95. I was 12.
[Loading screen]
I was on at most £1 a week, so that was ten weeks of savings.
Luckily, the 3D graphics were incomprehensibly good for the mid 1980s. Wonder who the genius programmer is.
I hadn’t met him yet, but it was the start of this story.

Source:https://blog.scraperwiki.com/2011/05/scraperwiki-a-story-about-two-boys-web-scraping-and-a-worm/

Thursday, 11 December 2014

Seven tools for web scraping – To use for data journalism & creating insightful content

I’ve been creating a lot of (data driven) creative content lately and one of the things I like to do is gathering as much data as I can from public sources. I even have some cases it is costing to much time to create and run database queries and my personal build PHP scraper is faster so I just wanted to share some tools that could be helpful. Just a short disclaimer: use these tools on your own risk! Scraping websites could generate high numbers of pageviews and with that, using bandwidth from the website you are scraping.

1. Scraper (Chrome plugin)

    Scraper is a simple data mining extension for Google Chrome™ that is useful for online research when you need to quickly analyze data in spreadsheet form.

You can select a specific data point, a price, a rating etc and then use your browser menu: click Scrape Similar and you will get multiple options to export or copy your data to Excel or Google Docs. This plugin is really basic but does the job it is build for: fast and easy screen scraping.

2. Simple PHP Scraper

PHP has a DOMXpath function. I’m not going to explain how this function works, but with the script below you can easily scrape a list of URLs. Since it is PHP, use a cronjob to hourly, daily or weekly scrape the desired data. If you are not used to creating Xpath references, use the Scraper for Chrome plugin by selecting the data point and see the Xpath reference directly.

scraper-example

– Click here to download the example script.

3. Kimono Labs

Kimono has two easy ways to scrape specific URLs: just paste the URL into their website or use their bookmark. Once you have pointed out the data you need, you can set how often and when you want the data to be collected. The data is saved in their database. I like the facts that their learning curve is not that steep and it doesn’t look like you need a PHD in engineering to use their software. The disadvantage of this tool is the fact you can’t upload multiple URLs at once.

4. Import.io

Import.io is a browser based web scraping tool. By following their easy step-by-step plan you select the data you want to scrape and the tool does the rest. It is a more sophisticated tool compared to Kimono. I like it because of the fact it shows a clear overview of all the scrapers you have active and you can scrape multiple URLs at once.

5. Outwit Hub

I will start with the two biggest differences compared to the previous tool: it is a softwarepackage to use on your PC or laptop and to use its full potential it will cost you 75 USD. The free version can only scrape 100 rows of data. What I do like is the number of preprogrammed options to scrape which makes it easy to start and learn about web scraping.

6. ScraperWiki

This tool is really for people wanting to scrape on a massive scale. You can code your own scrapers (in PHP, Ruby & Python) and pricing is really cheap looking to what you can get: 29USD / month for 100 datasets. You are completely free in using libraries and timers. And if your programming skills are not good enough, they can help you out (paid service though). Compared to other tools, this is the most advanced tool that offers the basics of web scraping.

7. Fminer.com

This tool made it possible to finally scrape all the data inside Google Webmaster Tools since it can deal with JavaScript and AJAX interfaces. Read my extensive review on this page: Scraping Webmaster Tools with FMiner!

But on the end, building your individual project scrapers will always be more effective than using predefined scrapers. Am I missing any tools in this sum up of tools?

Source: http://www.notprovided.eu/7-tools-web-scraping-use-data-journalism-creating-insightful-content/

Monday, 8 December 2014

Multiple Listing Service Gets Favorable Appellate Ruling in Scraping Lawsuit

This is a follow-up to our massive post on anti-scraping lawsuits in the real estate industry from New Year’s Eve 2012 (Note: the portion on MRIS is about halfway through the post, labeled “Same Writ, Different Plaintiff”).

AHRN is a California real estate broker that owns and operates NeighborCity.com. The site gets its data in part by scraping from MLS databases–in this case, MRIS. As part of the scraping, however, AHRN had collected and displayed copyrighted photographs among the bits and pieces of general textual information about the properties. MRIS sent a cease and desist letter to AHRN, and filed suit alleging various copyright claims after the parties failed to agree on a license to use the photographs. Ultimately, a district court in Maryland granted a motion made by MRIS for a preliminary injunction.

When we last left off, the district court had revised its preliminary injunction order to enjoin only AHRN’s use of MRIS’s photographs–not the compilation itself or any textual elements that may be considered a part of it. Since then, AHRN appealed the injunction. On July 18th, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

Background

shutterstock_108008486.jpgAHRN argued that MRIS failed to show a likelihood of success on its copyright infringement claim because MRIS: (1) failed to register its copyright in the individual photographs when it registered the database, and (2) did not have a copyright interest in the photographs because the subscribers’ electronic agreement to MRIS’s terms of use failed to transfer those rights.

 MRIS Did Not Fail to Register Its Interest in the Photographs

This first question revolved around the scope of MRIS’s registrations. AHRN argued that MRIS’s collective work registrations did not cover the individual photographs because MRIS did not identify the names of the authors and titles of those works. MRIS argued that 17 U.S.C. §409 did not require any such identification when applied to collective works, and that its general description of the pre-existing photographs’ inclusion sufficed.

The court began its discussion by noting the “ambiguous” nature of §409’s language and its varying judicial interpretations. Some courts have barred infringement suits because the collective work registrant failed to list the authors, while others have allowed infringement suits where the registrant owns the rights to the component works as well as the collective work.

In this case, the court agreed with MRIS and found that the latter approach was more consistent with the relevant statutes and regulations:

    Adding impediments to automated database authors’ attempts to register their own component works conflicts with the general purpose of Section 409 to encourage prompt registration . . . and thwarts the specific goal embodied in Section 408 of easing the burden on group registrations[.]

As part of its decision, the court looked favorably upon the 3Taps case, in which Craigslist sued 3Taps and Padmapper for scraping and repackaging its online classified ads. In that case, the court reasoned that it would be “inefficient” to require registrants to list each author of an extremely large number of component works to which the registrant already had obtained an exclusive license.

Having found that MRIS’s general description satisfied § 409’s pre-suit registration requirement, the court moved on to the merits of MRIS’s infringement claim–more specifically, the question of whether MRIS’s Terms of Use actually transferred a copyright interest to its subscribers’ photographs.

E-SIGN Applies to Assignments of Copyrights and Overrides § 204

AHRN challenged MRIS’s ownership of the photographs by arguing that an MLS subscriber’s electronic agreement to MRIS’s Terms of Use does not operate as an assignment of rights under § 204, which requires a signed “writing.”

In a bad sign for AHRN, the court began its discussion by volunteering an argument that MRIS did not even bring up:

    [I]n situations where “the copyright [author] appears to have no dispute with its [assignee] on this matter, it would be anomalous to permit a third party infringer to invoke [Section 204(a)’s signed writing requirement] against the [assignee].”

With that in mind, the court went on to discuss the E-SIGN act’s impact on the conveyance of copyrights. After establishing the meaning of “e-signature,” the court focused on whether the act was limited from covering this type of situation.

    The Act provides that it “does not . . . limit, alter, or otherwise affect any requirement imposed by a statute, regulation, or rule of law . . . other than a requirement that contracts or other records be written, signed, or in nonelectric form[.]”

The court emphasized the phrase “other than,” reasoning that a plain reading of the E-SIGN language showed that Congress intended the provisions to limit § 204. It also noted that Congress did not list copyright assignments among the various agreements to which E-SIGN did not apply–nor was there a catchall that included such assignments.

The court then turned to the Hermosilla case, in which a district court in Florida upheld the validity of a copyright conveyance via e-mail. It emphasized the Hermosilla court’s reliance on the purpose of § 204–“to resolve disputes between copyright owners and transferees and to protect copyright holders from persons mistakenly or fraudulently claiming oral licenses or copyright ownership.” The appellate court agreed with the Hermosilla court that allowing assignment via e-mail actually helped cut down on these types of disputes.

    To invalidate copyright transfer agreements solely because they were made electronically would thwart the clear congressional intent embodied in the E-Sign Act.

All in all, the court basically said “we don’t see why E-SIGN shouldn’t apply.” Note that it did not pass judgment specifically on whether MRIS’s Terms of Use constituted a valid contract. It simply mentioned that AHRN waived that argument by not bringing it up sooner.

Source: http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/07/multiple_listin_1.htm

Monday, 1 December 2014

The Roots of Web Scraping and the Wisdom behind It

You may be wondering how data mining came into existence. This effective and innovative trend in business and research is indeed something commendable and the genius behind it is worth great reward. To have a clear view of the origin of web scraping, the following important factors that contribute to the creation of this phenomenon called data collection or web scraping are considered.

Foundations

Unlike any other innovation, no specific date can be clearly pointed out as the birthdate of data mining. It has come into existence as a result of several problem solving processes in major data gathering and handling situations. It appears that cyber technology has opened a Pandora box of “anything can happen” experiences. Moreover, the shift from physical to virtual data collection has resulted in a bulk of database that needed to be organized, analyzed and utilized.

Source: http://www.loginworks.com/blogs/web-scraping-blogs/roots-web-scraping-wisdom-behind/